Mikey Lance Speculation

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Mikey Lance Speculation

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by Stroccos » Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:26 pm

JCB1977 wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:08 pm
jmack wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:21 pm I think James Gallo mentioned to the wired CI that he has helped make 300k in loans for Narducci. Who knows if he is telling the truth, but that is what was alleged.
Is that alleged statement about the loans in any affidavit or document? I think in his case, he’s going to plead out. What’s he facing?
Caught in a wire I posted it the fbi section.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by jmack » Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:56 am

JCB1977 wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:08 pm
jmack wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:21 pm I think James Gallo mentioned to the wired CI that he has helped make 300k in loans for Narducci. Who knows if he is telling the truth, but that is what was alleged.
Is that alleged statement about the loans in any affidavit or document? I think in his case, he’s going to plead out. What’s he facing?
I can’t remember where I saw it. It may have been in the detention memo or affidavit.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by JCB1977 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:08 pm

jmack wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:21 pm I think James Gallo mentioned to the wired CI that he has helped make 300k in loans for Narducci. Who knows if he is telling the truth, but that is what was alleged.
Is that alleged statement about the loans in any affidavit or document? I think in his case, he’s going to plead out. What’s he facing?

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by jmack » Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:21 pm

I think James Gallo mentioned to the wired CI that he has helped make 300k in loans for Narducci. Who knows if he is telling the truth, but that is what was alleged.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by JCB1977 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:33 pm

Fughedaboutit wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:23 pm
JCB1977 wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 12:24 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:41 am
SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:08 am
JCB1977 wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:59 pm All I am saying is that I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.
What’s your source? Do you have logs? You just stated that “I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.” What is your basis for it? Is it a hunch? Please explain how you come to that conclusion without solid facts/affidavits etc etc. i think the figment of your imagination is clouding your judgement. But everybody would love to hear how you solved the riddle. Present your analysis. This should be fun to watch :mrgreen:
Why are you breaking the guys balls?

Fugh stated clearly that it was an opinion (“I think”). He wasn’t claiming it to be fact.

People can have opinions on the board. We interpret information and come to our own conclusions. It’s only when people confuse the two should you start correcting.
Your post was pretty needless, at best.
Sonny, what I said was pretty clear. It was obviously an opinion. If you look in the Graveyard where he was called out as an informant, this post came shortly after that. It is clear he was triggered and wanted to attempt to "call me out" in here because he ducked responding there.

What makes it more obvious that what I said was not out of line is the fact several people are agreeing with me in the thread itself and through PM. (Probably as not to get ridiculed for their opinion)
Personally, I don’t disagree with your opinion. I find it fascinating how Philly has kept on going all these years. I have opinions myself on many different topics. I’m not bashing your opinion because you are entitled to it for sure, I was just curious to see the reasoning behind it. While Narducci had some exorbitant loans out there, I would assume that if the feds have been up his ass investigating him, they would’ve uncovered some of the other victims. I hope an indictment happens very soon because we will know more on what the government has or doesn’t have.
Not necessarily. He beat this guy up and he ratted. Maybe the others were paying up so he did not have to resort to violence and they were actually men about it and didnt run to the FBI. The guy is only going to put out a single loan? Unlikely for a loanshark.
I agree he had more loans out there...ok...now I understand where you were coming from and your reasoning behind your opinion. Thanks

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by Philly d » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:11 pm

Narducci beat the guy? I must have missed that.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by Stroccos » Fri Feb 15, 2019 2:09 pm

JCB1977 wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 12:24 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:41 am
SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:08 am
JCB1977 wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:59 pm All I am saying is that I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.
What’s your source? Do you have logs? You just stated that “I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.” What is your basis for it? Is it a hunch? Please explain how you come to that conclusion without solid facts/affidavits etc etc. i think the figment of your imagination is clouding your judgement. But everybody would love to hear how you solved the riddle. Present your analysis. This should be fun to watch :mrgreen:
Why are you breaking the guys balls?

Fugh stated clearly that it was an opinion (“I think”). He wasn’t claiming it to be fact.

People can have opinions on the board. We interpret information and come to our own conclusions. It’s only when people confuse the two should you start correcting.
Your post was pretty needless, at best.
Sonny, what I said was pretty clear. It was obviously an opinion. If you look in the Graveyard where he was called out as an informant, this post came shortly after that. It is clear he was triggered and wanted to attempt to "call me out" in here because he ducked responding there.

What makes it more obvious that what I said was not out of line is the fact several people are agreeing with me in the thread itself and through PM. (Probably as not to get ridiculed for their opinion)
Personally, I don’t disagree with your opinion. I find it fascinating how Philly has kept on going all these years. I have opinions myself on many different topics. I’m not bashing your opinion because you are entitled to it for sure, I was just curious to see the reasoning behind it. While Narducci had some exorbitant loans out there, I would assume that if the feds have been up his ass investigating him, they would’ve uncovered some of the other victims. I hope an indictment happens very soon because we will know more on what the government has or doesn’t have.
Was this a loan shark loan ? There was allegedly paperwork / contracts on it , once Narducci beat the guy and gallo threatend him it became a federal crime , up until then it may of just been a loan . From what I gather this guy was approached by the feds and only agreed to cooperate after Narducci slap him around , so it’s obv the feds knew about the loans
James Gallo is on the wire claiming he had more loans so take that to what it’s worth , it points to that Narducci had more then this loan

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by Fughedaboutit » Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:23 pm

JCB1977 wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 12:24 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:41 am
SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:08 am
JCB1977 wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:59 pm All I am saying is that I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.
What’s your source? Do you have logs? You just stated that “I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.” What is your basis for it? Is it a hunch? Please explain how you come to that conclusion without solid facts/affidavits etc etc. i think the figment of your imagination is clouding your judgement. But everybody would love to hear how you solved the riddle. Present your analysis. This should be fun to watch :mrgreen:
Why are you breaking the guys balls?

Fugh stated clearly that it was an opinion (“I think”). He wasn’t claiming it to be fact.

People can have opinions on the board. We interpret information and come to our own conclusions. It’s only when people confuse the two should you start correcting.
Your post was pretty needless, at best.
Sonny, what I said was pretty clear. It was obviously an opinion. If you look in the Graveyard where he was called out as an informant, this post came shortly after that. It is clear he was triggered and wanted to attempt to "call me out" in here because he ducked responding there.

What makes it more obvious that what I said was not out of line is the fact several people are agreeing with me in the thread itself and through PM. (Probably as not to get ridiculed for their opinion)
Personally, I don’t disagree with your opinion. I find it fascinating how Philly has kept on going all these years. I have opinions myself on many different topics. I’m not bashing your opinion because you are entitled to it for sure, I was just curious to see the reasoning behind it. While Narducci had some exorbitant loans out there, I would assume that if the feds have been up his ass investigating him, they would’ve uncovered some of the other victims. I hope an indictment happens very soon because we will know more on what the government has or doesn’t have.
Not necessarily. He beat this guy up and he ratted. Maybe the others were paying up so he did not have to resort to violence and they were actually men about it and didnt run to the FBI. The guy is only going to put out a single loan? Unlikely for a loanshark.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by JCB1977 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 12:24 pm

Fughedaboutit wrote: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:41 am
SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:08 am
JCB1977 wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:59 pm All I am saying is that I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.
What’s your source? Do you have logs? You just stated that “I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.” What is your basis for it? Is it a hunch? Please explain how you come to that conclusion without solid facts/affidavits etc etc. i think the figment of your imagination is clouding your judgement. But everybody would love to hear how you solved the riddle. Present your analysis. This should be fun to watch :mrgreen:
Why are you breaking the guys balls?

Fugh stated clearly that it was an opinion (“I think”). He wasn’t claiming it to be fact.

People can have opinions on the board. We interpret information and come to our own conclusions. It’s only when people confuse the two should you start correcting.
Your post was pretty needless, at best.
Sonny, what I said was pretty clear. It was obviously an opinion. If you look in the Graveyard where he was called out as an informant, this post came shortly after that. It is clear he was triggered and wanted to attempt to "call me out" in here because he ducked responding there.

What makes it more obvious that what I said was not out of line is the fact several people are agreeing with me in the thread itself and through PM. (Probably as not to get ridiculed for their opinion)
Personally, I don’t disagree with your opinion. I find it fascinating how Philly has kept on going all these years. I have opinions myself on many different topics. I’m not bashing your opinion because you are entitled to it for sure, I was just curious to see the reasoning behind it. While Narducci had some exorbitant loans out there, I would assume that if the feds have been up his ass investigating him, they would’ve uncovered some of the other victims. I hope an indictment happens very soon because we will know more on what the government has or doesn’t have.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by Fughedaboutit » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:41 am

SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:08 am
JCB1977 wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:59 pm All I am saying is that I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.
What’s your source? Do you have logs? You just stated that “I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.” What is your basis for it? Is it a hunch? Please explain how you come to that conclusion without solid facts/affidavits etc etc. i think the figment of your imagination is clouding your judgement. But everybody would love to hear how you solved the riddle. Present your analysis. This should be fun to watch :mrgreen:
Why are you breaking the guys balls?

Fugh stated clearly that it was an opinion (“I think”). He wasn’t claiming it to be fact.

People can have opinions on the board. We interpret information and come to our own conclusions. It’s only when people confuse the two should you start correcting.
Your post was pretty needless, at best.
Sonny, what I said was pretty clear. It was obviously an opinion. If you look in the Graveyard where he was called out as an informant, this post came shortly after that. It is clear he was triggered and wanted to attempt to "call me out" in here because he ducked responding there.

What makes it more obvious that what I said was not out of line is the fact several people are agreeing with me in the thread itself and through PM. (Probably as not to get ridiculed for their opinion)

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by JCB1977 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 9:02 pm

SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:08 am
JCB1977 wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:59 pm All I am saying is that I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.
What’s your source? Do you have logs? You just stated that “I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.” What is your basis for it? Is it a hunch? Please explain how you come to that conclusion without solid facts/affidavits etc etc. i think the figment of your imagination is clouding your judgement. But everybody would love to hear how you solved the riddle. Present your analysis. This should be fun to watch :mrgreen:
Why are you breaking the guys balls?

Fugh stated clearly that it was an opinion (“I think”). He wasn’t claiming it to be fact.

People can have opinions on the board. We interpret information and come to our own conclusions. It’s only when people confuse the two should you start correcting.
Your post was pretty needless, at best.
Just very interested to how he came up with his conclusion. Facts are important when forming an educated hypothesis. While the rackets in Philly have been diminished over the years, it’s extremely interesting to see how he came up with his conclusion. It’s the exact opposite of what has been reported and researched over the years so it’s only natural to be curious as to where he pulled his information from to form his opinion. Are you his wife? Worry about you Sonny. That she be enough :mrgreen:

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by slimshady_007 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:47 pm

SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:58 pm
slimshady_007 wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:54 pm I have to agree with Fughedaboutit. Philly’s membership has been growing and the organization has managed to dodge indictments for some time now.
Philly's resilience continues to astound but personally I'm guessing that house of cards is going to fall with the upcoming indictments.
Ur 100% right. Joey, dom, steve, mike lance, could all get pinched for rico, including hits dating back to the 90’s.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by SonnyBlackstein » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:58 pm

slimshady_007 wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:54 pm I have to agree with Fughedaboutit. Philly’s membership has been growing and the organization has managed to dodge indictments for some time now.
Philly's resilience continues to astound but personally I'm guessing that house of cards is going to fall with the upcoming indictments.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by slimshady_007 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:54 pm

I have to agree with Fughedaboutit. Philly’s membership has been growing and the organization has managed to dodge indictments for some time now.

Re: Mikey Lance Speculation

by SonnyBlackstein » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:08 am

JCB1977 wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 pm
Fughedaboutit wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:59 pm All I am saying is that I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.
What’s your source? Do you have logs? You just stated that “I think people are underestimating what Philly is pulling in.” What is your basis for it? Is it a hunch? Please explain how you come to that conclusion without solid facts/affidavits etc etc. i think the figment of your imagination is clouding your judgement. But everybody would love to hear how you solved the riddle. Present your analysis. This should be fun to watch :mrgreen:
Why are you breaking the guys balls?

Fugh stated clearly that it was an opinion (“I think”). He wasn’t claiming it to be fact.

People can have opinions on the board. We interpret information and come to our own conclusions. It’s only when people confuse the two should you start correcting.
Your post was pretty needless, at best.

Top