In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Raghead_Guido » Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:14 am

Villain wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 12:18 am

Image
The bit about prospective initiatives being led to believe they were about to plan a murder is reminiscent of Tommy Ricciardi, who was told by his Captain "Tumac" Accetturo that they had to go yo New York on "a piece of work", only to find the boss of his family staring right back at him.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by likethewatch » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:34 am

Amen. The Mafia is a culture, not a corporation. As for the ones who are seemingly devoted to a legitimate business, that's just as organic a part of it. Having friends who are willing to commit crimes for your benefit gives you a leg up in any industry where your competition is restricted to legal or nonviolent activities.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Cheech » Fri Nov 12, 2021 12:23 pm

Whats up UTC. Hope all is well

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by UTC » Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:30 pm

B. wrote: Sat Oct 30, 2021 3:17 pm
B. wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:45 pm
Wiseguy wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:04 am
B. wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:59 amVast majority of members are Republicans, so are their associates, friends, families, etc. Many were open Trump supporters.

Even the Sicilian mafia was/is traditionally conservative.
What are we basing that on? We've all seen the news articles about Rosotti and Staluppi donating to Bush back in the day. And the online gossip about some Philly guys liking Trump. But those are the only ones I can think of off hand. Traditionally at least, the connection was overwhelmingly with the Democratic political machine. Due, in no small part, to the unions. I'm not saying there hasn't been any change over the years. And like Capeci has said, most of them have a certain amount of patriotism, ironically enough. And are conservative in many ways, though I think that's due more to the Italian heritage and Catholicism than anything related to the Republican Party.
Cruise through their social media accounts and those of their family/friends. Look at their longstanding history going back to Sicily. Most of the guys who have podcasts lean right if they're not full-blown Republicans.

Some early Sicilian mafiosi supported the Fascist Party before Mussolini started targeting them. The mafia was involved in all kinds of anti-socialist activity in Sicily, sometimes violently.

It's a fundamentally conservative organization and that is usually (but not always) reflected in who they support. Their self-interest is of course #1 and transcends politics if they feel any party/politician/group isn't serving them properly.

I consider the mafia extremely socially conservative and economically libertarian in theory, with their economics being obviously corrupt and self-serving which libertarian policies are naturally subject to (making them more attractive as a "philosophy" than an actual "policy").
Just to add to this, on Frank Fiordilino's most recent MBA episode he says in his experience the mafia is heavily right wing and if you asked "600 wiseguys" they would have all voted for Trump.

Tom seemed confused because he said the Republican party is the "law and order" party, but I think there's confusion from outsiders over this aspect. Harry Riccobene and Nino Calderone both said the mafia supported the Fascist Party's initial crackdown on common criminals and really only became upset when Mussolini and Mori went after the mafia. I would bet the current New York Families have no problem with local LE going after other ethnic gangs and unaffiliated criminals, too.

I think the mafia's attitude on "law and order" is more self-serving than it is absolute. When Nick Piccolo had his business broken into in Philly he called the police to investigate because it was done by outsiders and he kept his captain position. Angelo Bruno had no issue with it.

You have exceptions with politics like Cascio Ferro being involved with anarchists and Bernardo Verro being a socialist, but Verro was apparently inducted because Corleone thought they could use his influence over workers and later killed him. The mafia leans right even in Sicilian mafia history. It makes sense too because hardline socialism is completely at odds with self-governance and the free market, which the mafia corrupts but requires to operate. The mafia is by its nature anti-federal which puts it at odds with leftism. Obviously the hardline social conservativism of the mafia doesn't work with leftism either.

There was a member source, I think one of the San Jose CIs, who said the mafia can exist anywhere except Communist countries.

The Sopranos' portrayal of these guys wasn't perfect, but they nailed the political opinions of Tony and his crew.
As has been said, once you're made "it's all legal".

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by B. » Sat Oct 30, 2021 7:02 pm

Haha, not a bad quote.

-

Some of this goes back to a conversation Antiliar, CC, and I had a few months ago about the Stuppagghiari in Monreale. Some have said it was a war between a sort of respectable "anti-mafia" mafia group that included police officers against a younger criminal mafia, which would make the Stuppagghiari not an actual mafia group if they had cops... but I wonder if that is true.

I'd argue the early Sicilian mafia could have inducted local police like they did mayors, judges, priests, etc. On the other hand the mafia would have never inducted Carabinieri or federal police. The Monreale Family later inducted Judge Balsamo who presided over mafia trials and made comments against the mafia but Dr. Allegra said he was actually a Cosa Nostra member too. Some made members in political office made similar anti-mafia statements publicly while secretly assisting their "fratelli". Judge Balsamo isn't that far off from the cops who joined the Stuppagghiari earlier on.

There was that police sergeant in NJ Peter Policastro who Valachi ID'd as a Bonanno member. He was def a corrupt cop very close to Carmine Galante, Joe Zicarelli, etc. but I think he later testified in some capacity. He's listed in the FBN "Mafia" book.

There was also a Lombardino in Newark related to the mafia Lombardinos who one of the San Jose informants said was a police officer that carried out a mafia murder early on. Doesn't mean he was a member or anything, could have been like Lou Eppolito in that he was a relative of members who did hits and gave intel. In early Sicily the level of municipal control would allow a cop to be fully under the mafia though so who knows what the history is.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Pogo The Clown » Sat Oct 30, 2021 4:50 pm

B. wrote: Sat Oct 30, 2021 3:17 pm Tom seemed confused because he said the Republican party is the "law and order" party, but I think there's confusion from outsiders over this aspect. Harry Riccobene and Nino Calderone both said the mafia supported the Fascist Party's initial crackdown on common criminals and really only became upset when Mussolini and Mori went after the mafia. I would bet the current New York Families have no problem with local LE going after other ethnic gangs and unaffiliated criminals, too.

I think the mafia's attitude on "law and order" is more self-serving than it is absolute. When Nick Piccolo had his business broken into in Philly he called the police to investigate because it was done by outsiders and he kept his captain position. Angelo Bruno had no issue with it.

"You can't have organized crime without law and order." - Don Carmine Falcone


Pogo

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by B. » Sat Oct 30, 2021 3:28 pm

I thought Sammy Gravano was flirting with Dem/left sympathy when he first showed up on YouTube but that last Valuetainment interview he went off against the Democrats/left.

Of course I don't think Sammy actually believes in anything except Sammy Gravano and his politics are going to change with the wind depending on what he thinks will get "views".

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by B. » Sat Oct 30, 2021 3:17 pm

B. wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:45 pm
Wiseguy wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:04 am
B. wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:59 amVast majority of members are Republicans, so are their associates, friends, families, etc. Many were open Trump supporters.

Even the Sicilian mafia was/is traditionally conservative.
What are we basing that on? We've all seen the news articles about Rosotti and Staluppi donating to Bush back in the day. And the online gossip about some Philly guys liking Trump. But those are the only ones I can think of off hand. Traditionally at least, the connection was overwhelmingly with the Democratic political machine. Due, in no small part, to the unions. I'm not saying there hasn't been any change over the years. And like Capeci has said, most of them have a certain amount of patriotism, ironically enough. And are conservative in many ways, though I think that's due more to the Italian heritage and Catholicism than anything related to the Republican Party.
Cruise through their social media accounts and those of their family/friends. Look at their longstanding history going back to Sicily. Most of the guys who have podcasts lean right if they're not full-blown Republicans.

Some early Sicilian mafiosi supported the Fascist Party before Mussolini started targeting them. The mafia was involved in all kinds of anti-socialist activity in Sicily, sometimes violently.

It's a fundamentally conservative organization and that is usually (but not always) reflected in who they support. Their self-interest is of course #1 and transcends politics if they feel any party/politician/group isn't serving them properly.

I consider the mafia extremely socially conservative and economically libertarian in theory, with their economics being obviously corrupt and self-serving which libertarian policies are naturally subject to (making them more attractive as a "philosophy" than an actual "policy").
Just to add to this, on Frank Fiordilino's most recent MBA episode he says in his experience the mafia is heavily right wing and if you asked "600 wiseguys" they would have all voted for Trump.

Tom seemed confused because he said the Republican party is the "law and order" party, but I think there's confusion from outsiders over this aspect. Harry Riccobene and Nino Calderone both said the mafia supported the Fascist Party's initial crackdown on common criminals and really only became upset when Mussolini and Mori went after the mafia. I would bet the current New York Families have no problem with local LE going after other ethnic gangs and unaffiliated criminals, too.

I think the mafia's attitude on "law and order" is more self-serving than it is absolute. When Nick Piccolo had his business broken into in Philly he called the police to investigate because it was done by outsiders and he kept his captain position. Angelo Bruno had no issue with it.

You have exceptions with politics like Cascio Ferro being involved with anarchists and Bernardo Verro being a socialist, but Verro was apparently inducted because Corleone thought they could use his influence over workers and later killed him. The mafia leans right even in Sicilian mafia history. It makes sense too because hardline socialism is completely at odds with self-governance and the free market, which the mafia corrupts but requires to operate. The mafia is by its nature anti-federal which puts it at odds with leftism. Obviously the hardline social conservativism of the mafia doesn't work with leftism either.

There was a member source, I think one of the San Jose CIs, who said the mafia can exist anywhere except Communist countries.

The Sopranos' portrayal of these guys wasn't perfect, but they nailed the political opinions of Tony and his crew.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by PolackTony » Thu Oct 28, 2021 8:28 pm

UTC wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 8:10 pm
CabriniGreen wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:55 pm Some great info here @ Villian....

I wanna look at some contemporary examples... to illustrate the criminality aspect over the legitimate....


1. Arrilotta - Made guy. West Side, the " Ivey League".
You know what threw me about this guy? He got involved in the streets, he himself said he didnt give education much interest. He gets in debt 100k to a shylock, then he just....... goes and ask his Dad for the 100k. Then proceeds to say his Dad had a very successful flower business.

Now, I was confused, like..... why didnt you just go into the family's LEGITIMATE BUSINESS? Or at least, try to expand it? If he wasnt into flowers, he coulda went to his DAD, not a LOANSHARK, for the 100k and started a legit business. No, he goes to the streets. And not a Union racket, or gambling either. No, he goes and sell the Mexican brick weed.

2. Leandro Greco - Scion of a mafia dynasty in Sicily.... but the son of a law abiding citizen. His father didnt get involved in crime, and instead became I think, a movie director.

Leandro however, takes after his Grandfather, Michele and becomes the latest in the line of Greco clan bosses.
I doubt the clan threw its resources and full support behind the elder Grecos film endeavors. Hes probably looked at as a " civilian". Leandro could have run for public office, anything. He became a mafiosi.

Whom do we think holds the greater respect? The citizen? Or the Boss?


3. Paolo Bontade - again, son of a mafia Scion. Could run for Mayor probably, or started ANYTHING legit, but his name pops up in criminal investigations.


4. Leonardo Rizzuto - Scion of a powerful mafiosi. An actual lawyer, but just couldnt stay legitimate. Hell, same with the construction based murdered son, Nick jr.

5. The Campos thing - One of the reasons that indictment is silly to me is the inveterate "Hoodlumness"
of it. They couldnt just run a construction company, they had to shit where they ate.

What they did, is what I would expect if you put the typical gang leader in that position. Instead of trying to leverage the next 80 million dollar deal, you worried about floor tiles and a new bathroom.

Even that Hootie guy. Said he got a union job at like 18, in the PJs, I think. Decent money. I'm like, so why you still selling drugs?
There are also some common personality traits found in criminals that may help to explain these seemingly unexpected developments. Anti-social mindset, impulse control, narcissism, attention deficit, power centric thinking, etc. It's not all social conditioning. Greco's situation reminds me of Amongst Friends.
Bingo.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by UTC » Thu Oct 28, 2021 8:10 pm

CabriniGreen wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:55 pm Some great info here @ Villian....

I wanna look at some contemporary examples... to illustrate the criminality aspect over the legitimate....


1. Arrilotta - Made guy. West Side, the " Ivey League".
You know what threw me about this guy? He got involved in the streets, he himself said he didnt give education much interest. He gets in debt 100k to a shylock, then he just....... goes and ask his Dad for the 100k. Then proceeds to say his Dad had a very successful flower business.

Now, I was confused, like..... why didnt you just go into the family's LEGITIMATE BUSINESS? Or at least, try to expand it? If he wasnt into flowers, he coulda went to his DAD, not a LOANSHARK, for the 100k and started a legit business. No, he goes to the streets. And not a Union racket, or gambling either. No, he goes and sell the Mexican brick weed.

2. Leandro Greco - Scion of a mafia dynasty in Sicily.... but the son of a law abiding citizen. His father didnt get involved in crime, and instead became I think, a movie director.

Leandro however, takes after his Grandfather, Michele and becomes the latest in the line of Greco clan bosses.
I doubt the clan threw its resources and full support behind the elder Grecos film endeavors. Hes probably looked at as a " civilian". Leandro could have run for public office, anything. He became a mafiosi.

Whom do we think holds the greater respect? The citizen? Or the Boss?


3. Paolo Bontade - again, son of a mafia Scion. Could run for Mayor probably, or started ANYTHING legit, but his name pops up in criminal investigations.


4. Leonardo Rizzuto - Scion of a powerful mafiosi. An actual lawyer, but just couldnt stay legitimate. Hell, same with the construction based murdered son, Nick jr.

5. The Campos thing - One of the reasons that indictment is silly to me is the inveterate "Hoodlumness"
of it. They couldnt just run a construction company, they had to shit where they ate.

What they did, is what I would expect if you put the typical gang leader in that position. Instead of trying to leverage the next 80 million dollar deal, you worried about floor tiles and a new bathroom.

Even that Hootie guy. Said he got a union job at like 18, in the PJs, I think. Decent money. I'm like, so why you still selling drugs?
There are also some common personality traits found in criminals that may help to explain these seemingly unexpected developments. Anti-social mindset, impulse control, narcissism, attention deficit, power centric thinking, etc. It's not all social conditioning. Greco's situation reminds me of Amongst Friends.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Wiseguy » Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:33 pm

Chris Christie wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:25 am Wiseguy, didn't I make you laugh or even smile just a little bit with that Joe Bonanno reference regarding his involvement with drugs?
Sure. I actually thought of responding, "OK, sure Dan," but let it be.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Pogo The Clown » Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:27 am

I wouldn't even say it is an exception. You can add the Windows scam, the garbage routes, the parking lot racket, the push carts, the Vegas skim, Atlantic City, the national and local unions, etc. Almost from the beginning the families have been coordinating to control a specific criminal racket and or assigning people to oversee a specifics criminal operation.


Pogo

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Angelo Santino » Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:25 am

Wiseguy, didn't I make you laugh or even smile just a little bit with that Joe Bonanno reference regarding his involvement with drugs?

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Wiseguy » Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:14 am

CabriniGreen wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 12:10 am
HairyKnuckles wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:23 pm
Chris Christie wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 6:35 pm ...because the mafia hierarchy isn't set up to manage criminal activity, it's set up to manage its members who engage in criminal activity. There is a distinction.
Absolutely! I couldn´t agree more. And it´s not like Paul Castellano (for example) ordered a brokster member of his Family to go out and rob someone because that is what he is "supposed" to do.
And yet, you had a guy like Castellano get chastised by a guy like Chin, precisely for using the Commision, the mafias decision making apparatus, for the managing of criminal operations directly like the Construction rackets.


We really could do this all day.......
They're the exception to the rule but other examples would be the the bosses of 4 NY families overseeing the Concrete Club or the families assigning specific people to oversee the gas tax scam.

Re: In light of the recent Colombo bust, my observations.

by Villain » Tue Oct 26, 2021 6:55 am

CabriniGreen wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 6:23 am
I love Ebolis article on Catena. Did you read the part on his attempts to get into something as harmless as DETERGENT? This to me is mafia " Legitimacy" in a nutshell.


I saw Hairy's post about how Castellano would never order you to commit a robbery. Then I cant help but remember Gotti ordering the reopening of the pipeline, or that Calderone book, where the Ercolano kid gets made, at the ceremony they tell him, " You cant steal", and hes like, " What?.... but I steal." And the guys like, "No, you misunderstand, you can steal..." ..

Let's take out the crime part. What is the PURPOSE of the mafia at that point? The overarching strategy, the actual goal of the organization? What methodology do they use to gain power?
:lol: Old time Outfit boss Murray Humphreys (one of Chicagos most ruthless racketeers and a killer) also hated robbers and refused to deal with them, and above all he advised the rest of the top admin to stay away from those guys. This doesnt prove anything since Humphreys was still a racketeer, kidnapper and killer.

I also agree regarding the point of Catena getting into something as harmless as detergent, since these guys also sold FAKE food like painted olives and peppers :lol: (speaking about Robin Hood and brotherhood stuff :roll: )

If you take out the crime part from Cosa Nostra, youll get a bunch of men working in different legitimate institutions and companies and share their paychecks between each other and kick up to the oldest of members who in turn receive the highest of paychecks :lol:

Top